|
| |

GRID CALIBRATION OVERVIEW
GOAL:
 |
Knowledge to ~1% of grid pair transmission, modulation amplitude and phase,
|
as a function of energy and source offset,
expressed in a manner that can be efficiently applied to the data.
MOTIVATION:
 | Artifact-free light-curves |
 | |
 | High dynamic range imaging |
 | Unbiased and artifact-free spectroscopy |
METHOD:
- Obtain optical, x-ray, mass and thickness calibration data on individual grids
- Define a tractable grid model consistent with calibration data
- Calculate single grid transmission, spatial modulation and phase (E, angle)
- Combine single grid results to get grid pair transmission, modulation amplitude and phase.
(Sub-collimator response table)
- Integrate and interpolate sub-collimator response table as necessary for individual flares.
(Grid response matrix)
- Use in-flight self-calibration to refine grid models as needed.

PRIMARY OBSERVATIONAL DATA
 | OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS OF GRID SURFACE |
 | Average pitch |
 | Average rms deviation |
 | Slat width distribution (+unknown constant) |
 | Average slit orientation |
 | Position of slits (phase) |
 | X-RAY |
 | Peak transmission for Cd109, Co57, Cs137 (23, 122, 662 kev) |
 | FWHM of single grid transmission at 23 and 122 kev |
 | 1-degree transmission at 122 and 662 kev |
 | MISCELLANEOUS |
 | Mass of stacked grid (Tecomet) |
 | Grid thickness at rims (Tecomet) |
 | Dimensions and mass of typical spare blades (VBC) |

WEAKNESSES IN OBSERVATIONAL DATA
 | No direct measurements of slit widths of individual layers (Tecomet) |
 | No direct measurement of surface density of unetched Tecomet grid layers |
 | No direct measurements of average profile of stacked slit edges |
 | No direct measurements of tilt distribution for VBC blades |

STATUS OF GRID CALIBRATION TASK
 | Optical data fully analyzed |
 | Used as basis for grid alignment |
 | Alignment independently confirmed by gridlet test |
 | Determination of grid model parameters is in progress |
 | VBC grid data self-consistent to 1 – 2% |
 | Tecomet grid parameters consistent to ~5% |
 | Software to convert grid parameters to sub-collimator response table is working |
 | Some additional features are being added |
 | Software to apply grid calibration data for imaging and spectroscopy is in SSW. |

GOAL
 | Use internal redundancy to fine-tune grid parameters. |
FEATURES
 | Approach: Adjust grid parameters until corrected count rate ratios are independent of (low) energy and flare location |
 | High energy response is not sensitive to details of grid model. |
 | Uses count rates, rather than modulation (much more sensitive) |
 | Recalculated sub-collimator response table should be stable and common to all flares |
 | Not a user-task. |
 | Procedures to be verified before launch using simulated data. |
EXAMPLES OF TECHNIQUE
 | Grid phase determined by elimination of ‘wobble’ in single sub-collimator image |
 | Tilt is corrected by elimination of 4-second periodicity in corrected light curves |
 | Slit/thickness ratio is determined by elimination of 2-second periodicity in corrected count rates. |
 | Effective slit width is determined by comparing peak Tecomet and VBC grid count rate ratios |

|