|
Group E
PROGRAM
Dosimetry and Human Effects
Introduction
A. Introductory Remarks: McKeever (NRC report;
PEL NASA document; NCRP)
B. Space Radiation Dosimetry for Human Exploration Missions...so far: Benton
Discussion Points
(order TBD)
1. Given the current NASA timeline for the
development of the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), what can the scientific
community realistically do to reduce or minimize the risk to crew from exposure
to space radiation on the CEV?
-
CEV is planned to be operational no later
than 2014, maybe as early as 2010. First human return mission to the Moon is
planned for 2018. This means that the major design decisions for the CEV,
including radiation detection instrumentation and radiation protection
designs (e.g. radiation shielding materials and the placement of shielding)
will be made in the next two to three years.
-
What are the major unanswered questions
regarding human exposure to space radiation beyond the Earth’s magnetosphere
that will impact the near term Exploration effort?
2. How do we minimize the deleterious effects of
a major SPE on crew should such an event occur during a Lunar or Mars mission?
Possible approaches include:
-
shielding the whole of the habitable volume
of the CEV;
-
including a storm shelter in surface habitats
and in a Mars transfer vehicle;
-
shielding for the Lunar lander vs. fast abort
capability;
-
use of in situ resources to shield a surface
habitat.
How much shielding is needed to protect crew from
SPE and how does this differ from the shielding needed to protect crew from
exposure to GCR? What form (multifunctional material, atomic composition) should
this shielding take?3. How do we minimize the deleterious effects of
GCR exposure on crew? Scenarios include:
-
EVA and Lunar/Martian surface exploration;
-
on board Luna/Martian Lander;
-
in habitat on Lunar/Martian Surface;
-
in CEV during Earth-Moon/Mars transit.
Possible approaches include:
-
shielding the habitable volume of the CEV and
Mars transfer vehicle;
-
use of in situ resources to shield a surface
habitat;
-
for Mars missions, flying fast, i.e. using
nuclear propulsion;
-
for EVA or surface exploration, real-time
active instrumentation and fast return to safe habitat.
4. What dosimetric data are still needed to
accurately predict crew exposures on missions to and from the Moon and Mars?
5. What dosimetric instrumentation is needed to
monitor crew exposure during Exploration missions?
-
What quantities need to be measured and when
(during the mission or after) is this information needed?
-
How will instrumentation for dosimetry during
SPE differ from that for dosimetry of GCR exposure?
-
How much redundancy is needed, i.e. area
monitors vs. personal dosimeters, active detectors vs. passive detectors,
number of detectors based on different operating principles?
-
Besides dosimeters to monitor crew exposure,
what other radiation detection instrumentation is needed, e.g. internal vs.
external detectors, alarmed detectors, neutron monitors,
telescope/spectrometers, etc.?
6. How do we incorporate ALARA into Exploration
Missions? What can we learn from NCRP-142?7. What “model” SPE event should be used in
guiding shielding design and mission planning? What energy range should we be
looking at?
Download the pdf
version of this page. |