Last Update 29-Jun-2020, Kim Tolbert (kim.tolbert at nasa.gov)
Images and related products were generated for >75,000 RHESSI flares using the procedures described in RHESSI Image Archive Strategy. Quick access to the flare images is provided through the RHESSI Flare Image Archive monthly listings. To view the available information for a given flare, first select the year and month via the pulldown options, and click "Load". Then scan the line-per-flare listing for the flare of interest and select the link to the full web page for that flare, or to a quick look at various plots. The figure below shows the beginning of the list for July 2002.
Some things to note regarding the list:
Caveat
Some of the images in this archive are invalid. Usually this is obvious from the lack of coherent structure in a single image, or by inconsistency between successive times or energies. There are several reasons for this.
Below, we discuss the items on each flare web page, explain how to use the FITS files in the archive, and describe each type of plot included in the image archive. We used the flare of 20-Aug-2002 08:21 - 08:36 (flare number 20820140) as an example.
Flare Web Pages
Using the FITS files from the Image Archive
Aspect Solution Plots
Time Profile Plots
Image Panel Display
Images
Visibility Comparison Plots
Profile Comparison Plots
Each single-flare web page shows some general information about the flare (start, peak, and end times, peak rate, and more from the RHESSI event list) and two plots - the aspect solution plot during the full flare interval and GOES and RHESSI time profile plots showing the time/energy binning selected for this flare (both plots are discussed in detail below). Links to the following items are located to the right of these plots:
Below this general area, the images, image movies, and other plots generated for each image reconstruction algorithm (Back Projection, Clean, Clean_59, MEM_GE, VIS_CS, and VIS_FWDFIT) are displayed or links are provided.
You can download the imagecube, visibility, and eventlist FITS files for a particular flare by right-clicking the link on the flare web page, or by going directly to the archive (links below). In the commands below, we assume the relevant file name is in the variable 'fitsfilename'.
hsi_fits2map, fitsfilename, map, /sep
obj->set,im_input_fits=fitsfilename
hessi, obj
obj->plotman
obj->set,vis_input_fits=fitsfilename
obj->set,ev_filename=fitsfilename
Aspect Solution PlotsThe direction of the imaging axis is determined on sub-second time scales with sub-arcsecond accuracy from the data provided by the RHESSI Aspect System made up of the Solar Aspect System and the Roll Angle System. The aspect solution plot shows this direction of the imaging axis on the solar disk (solar limb shown in dark blue) as it moves in circles (black) about the spin axis (red +), during the full flare time interval. Also shown is the flare location (green X). Each black circle in the plot represents one rotation of the spacecraft (4 seconds). The spin axis is plotted simply at the center of each 4s circle. The diameter of the circle changes with time as the image axis precesses about the spin axis. Three main factors control this precession - (1) the contraction/expansion of the spacecraft components with changes in temperature resulting from the day/night cycle, (2) the physical motion of the attenuators moving into and out of the detector fields of view, and (3) the actions of the spacecraft attitude control system as the magnetic torquers keep the spin axis in approximately the same location on the solar disk (near disk center in the southwest quadrant). Once a month or so, the torquers are used to increase the spin rate back to the nominal 15 rpm. The aspect solution plot on the flare web page covers the entire flare time interval. Movies showing the aspect solution during each image time bin are available through the 'Movie of Aspect Solution in Image Time Bins' link. Occasionally, errors in the aspect solution show up as wild departures from the circular motion of the imaging axis. An example is shown in the figure on the right for 01-Mar-2002 16:24 - 16:27. Such a bad aspect solution makes it impossible to make an image for those time intervals. Looking at the aspect solution plot movies reveals when the aspect solution failed. In the case on the right, all image time intervals had a good aspect solution except for the last one as can be seen in this movie. RHESSI image reconstruction relies on modulation by the grids, but note that there is no modulation at all for a source located on the spin axis if the image axis is also coincident with the spin axis. Thus, image reconstruction becomes more problematic if the source is close to the spin axis, especially if the diameter of imaging axis circles is small. In those cases, there may not be a full modulation period for the coarser grids and only compact sources can be imaged from the modulation with the finer grids. |
Time Profile PlotsThe time profile plot has 3 panels.
|
Image Panel DisplayFor each algorithm, all of the images that were generated are displayed in a grid of time (horizontal) and energy (vertical) bins. Some of the cells are blank if the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio was too low in that time/energy bin. The SNR requirement was 4.0 for MEM_GE and 2.0 for the other algorithms. It was determined empirically with the goal of producing only scientifically meaningful images (unfortunately some nonsense images are still made). There are two panel display plots:
Here (and similarly in the flare image web page), clicking the plot opens the plot file, and clicking again in the plot enlarges the plot, centered on the location you clicked, with a scroll bar along the bottom if needed. The example shown here is for the CLEAN algorithm. |
ImagesFor each image reconstruction algorithm, the image frame at the peak time interval for each energy band that could be imaged is displayed and can be enlarged by clicking the image. Below the image is a figure showing the corresponding visibility comparison plot. Above each image are links for the following:
For some flares, the left-most column contains an image and link for a movie of the low-energy images overlaid by contours at 50,70,90% of the high-energy images. These are available when images were made for more than one energy band and there is a high-energy band at 12-25 keV or above with an SNR value of > 5. Each movie frame (an example of the 12-25 keV CLEAN image at peak time is on the left) shows the following:
|
Visibility Comparison PlotsFor each image generated (each time/energy/algorithm), we have generated a plot like the one to the right, comparing the observed visibilities to the visibilities predicted by the image. The X-axis tick values are the detector number plus the position roll angle (spatial direction of each grid response referenced to solar north) fraction, so e.g. the points between ticks 3 and 4 show the data for Detector 3 as a function of roll angle. The red outlines show which detectors were used to make the image. The Y-axis is the visibility amplitude in photons cm-2 s-1. The legend includes the time/energy/algorithm used and the reduced chi-square values computed from the measured and predicted visibility vectors weighted by the statistical uncertainties for
The closer the predicted amplitudes are to the measured values, quantified by the chi-square value, the more reliable the image. In this example, measured and predicted visibilities for detectors 5, 6, and 7 are well matched but significant deviations exist for detectors 3 and 4 reflecting the limited ability of the clean algorithm to accurately reproduce the finer source structure. The deviations for detectors 8 and 9 are an indication of the systematic uncertainties in the relative sensitivities of the different detectors. |
Profile Comparison PlotsVisibility (described above) and profile comparison plots have been generated for all events to provide two convenient ways to quantitatively evaluate how well the reconstructed images would reproduce the measured count rates in each of the detectors. For each image generated using the CLEAN algorithm, we have generated a plot like the one to the left, comparing the measured count rates to the count rates predicted by the reconstructed image. (These plots are not available for back projection because the image is unitless, or for visibility-based algorithms because the count data is no longer available in the imagecube-generating software after making the visibilities.) The plots show the individual detector count rates plotted as a function of the sum of the regularized roll angle (spacecraft roll angle corrected for the offset between the spin axis and the mean subcollimator optical axis) and the phase of the modulation in each roll-angle bin. The measured rates are in red and the rates predicted from the reconstructed image are in white. The data displayed have been phase-stacked into rotation angle/phase bins for the duration of the image time interval. There are typically between 6 and 64 roll-angle bins and 12 phase bins within each roll-angle bin. The number of roll-angle bins is larger for the finer grids and is equal to the number of peaks present in the plot for each detector. Thus, the X-axis corresponds to the combination of roll-angle bins with 12 phase bins (0-2π) within each roll-angle bin. The scale is marked with continuous angles for convenience. The agreement between the measured and predicted rates is an indication of how well the reconstructed image matches the data. This agreement is quantified with the Cash or C-statistic, given as a separate value for each detector and as an overall value for all detectors together. |